Office of the Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner. Guide to FOIP, Chapter 4, Exemptions from the Right of Access. Updated 24 July 2025. 248 • Why did the government institution decide not to disclose pursuant to subsection 19(3). • Did the government institution consider the purposes of FOIP in its decision. For example: o Provides for the right of access. o Government information should be available to the public. o Necessary exemptions should be limited and specific. • Did the government institution consider: o The value of public education with respect to the subject matter of the information. o Public confidence in regulatory, enforcement or investigatory systems. o Need for public awareness of successes or failures of regulatory enforcement or investigatory systems. o The need for public awareness of legislative or regulatory gaps or inadequacies in the areas of public health, safety, or environmental protection. • Were the interests of all groups interested in disclosure of the information considered. o How • What is the danger of further disclosure. • Was the decision not to apply subsection 19(3) based in part on a fear of public confusion. o If so, what would give rise to or cause the confusion. • Could the government institution take measures to reduce or eliminate the dangers. o Are there public relations measures. o Are there explanations that can be given. o Why could no other measures be taken. • Could the third party take measures (with respect to subsection 19(1) information) that could reduce the impact on them of disclosure. o What measures. o Why could no measures be taken.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTgwMjYzOA==