Office of the Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner. Guide to LA FOIP, Chapter3, Access to Records. Updated 5 May 2023. 43 Clarifying vs Narrowing Clarifying versus narrowing mean very different things. The Commissioner has addressed this in more than one Report where it was found that a government institution or local authority, relying on subsections 6(1)(b) or 6(3) of LA FOIP or The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, had attempted to force applicants to narrow a request which is not an appropriate application of these subsections. To clarify is to remove complexity, ambiguity, or obscurity from; to make clear or plain; remove ignorance, misconception or error from.75 To narrow is to become narrower, decrease in width or breadth; diminish, lessen, contract.76 Local authorities are not authorized under LA FOIP to require an applicant to “narrow” an access to information request. If a request is clear but is voluminous and requires a lot of work to search and gather records, the local authority should issue a fee estimate pursuant to section 9 of LA FOIP. Once issued, the local authority should make efforts to work with the applicant to reduce the fee by narrowing the access to information request. However, if an applicant chooses not to narrow and prefers to pay the fee, the local authority should process the request. Narrowing should not be confused with clarifying an access to information request. Section 6 of LA FOIP does not contemplate “narrowing” but rather “clarifying”. Subsections 6(1)(b) and 6(3) of LA FOIP address situations where a local authority cannot determine what the applicant is seeking. Subsection 6(1)(b) of LA FOIP requires an applicant to provide “sufficient particularity” as to time, place, and event to enable an individual familiar with the subject-matter to identify the record. Sufficient particularity means stating precisely what is being sought. Applicants should provide sufficient detail to enable an experienced employee of the local authority, with reasonable effort, to identify the records sought.77 The requirement of LA FOIP on both applicants and local authorities in combination with the purposes of the Act demonstrate an intention on the part of the Legislature that an 75 The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles, Sixth edition, Oxford University Press 1973, Volume 1 at p. 422. 76 The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles, Sixth edition, Oxford University Press 1973, Volume 2 at p. 1891. 77 See SK OIPC Disregard Decision 040-2022, 041-2022, 042-2022 at [49] and [50]. See also subsection 5(1)(a) of British Columbia’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, subsection 24(1)(b) of Ontario’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, and subsection 6(1)(b) of Nova Scotia’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTgwMjYzOA==