Guide to LA FOIP-Chapter 4

Office of the Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner. Guide to LA FOIP, Chapter 4, Exemptions from the Right of Access. Updated 24 July 2025. 131 unambiguous meaning of the words of the statute.471 “Relating to” requires some connection between the information and the management of personnel or the administration of a local authority.472 3. Has the plan(s) been implemented by the local authority? Implementation means the point when the implementation of a decision begins. For example, if a local authority decides to go forward with an internal budget cut or restructuring of departments, implementation commences when this plan of action is communicated to its organizational units.473 In order for the third part of the test to be met, the plan(s) cannot yet have been implemented. However, it is not necessary for the implementation activities to have been completed.474 Yet means at some time in the future, in the remaining time available, before all is over.475 Subsection 16(1) of LA FOIP includes the requirement that access can be refused where it “could reasonably be expected to disclose” the protected information listed in the exemptions. The meaning of the phrase “could reasonably be expected to” in terms of harm-based exemptions was considered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Service) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), (2014). Although section 16 of LA FOIP is not a harms-based provision, the threshold provided by the Court for “could reasonably be expected to” is instructive: This Court in Merck Frosst adopted the “reasonable expectation of probable harm” formulation and it should be used wherever the “could reasonably be expected to” language is used in access to information statutes. As the Court in Merck Frosst emphasized, the statute tries to mark out a middle ground between that which is probable and that which is merely possible. An institution must provide evidence “well beyond” or “considerably above” a mere possibility of harm in order to reach that middle ground: paras. 197 and 199. This inquiry of course is contextual and how much evidence and the quality of evidence needed to meet this standard will ultimately depend on the 471 Adapted from Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star, 2010 ONSC 991 (CanLII) at [45]. 472 Adapted from Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star, 2010 ONSC 991 (CanLII) at [43]. 473 Service Alberta, FOIP Guidelines and Practices: 2009 Edition, Chapter 4, p. 181. 474 British Columbia Government Services, FOIPPA Policy and Procedures Manual at https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for-government/policiesprocedures/foippa-manual/disclosure-harmful-economic-interests. Accessed July 17, 2019. 475 Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles, 6th Edition, Volume 2. N-Z, (Oxford University Press) at p. 3693. Definition first used in SK OIPC Review Report 166-2018 at [29].

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTgwMjYzOA==