Office of the Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner. Guide to LA FOIP, Chapter 4, Exemptions from the Right of Access. Updated 18 Oct 2023. 184 … (2) A head may give access to a record that contains information described in subsection (1) with the written consent of the third party to whom the information relates. (3) Subject to Part V, a head may give access to a record that contains information described in clauses (1)(b) to (d) if: (a) disclosure of that information could reasonably be expected to be in the public interest as it relates to public health, public safety or protection of the environment; and (b) the public interest in disclosure could reasonably be expected to clearly outweigh in importance any: (i) financial loss or gain to; (ii) prejudice to the competitive position of; or (iii) interference with contractual or other negotiations of; a third party. Subsection 18(1)(c) of LA FOIP is a mandatory, harm-based provision. It permits refusal of access in situations where disclosure could reasonably be expected to result in the harms outlined at subclauses (i), (ii) and (iii). Local authorities and third parties should not assume that the harms are self-evident. The harm must be described in a precise and specific way in order to support the application of the provision. Subclause 18(1)(c)(i) Third party information 18(1) Subject to Part V and this section, a head shall refuse to give access to a record that contains: … (c) information, the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to: (i) result in financial loss or gain to; … a third party; … (2) A head may give access to a record that contains information described in subsection (1) with the written consent of the third party to whom the information relates.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTgwMjYzOA==