Office of the Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner. Guide to LA FOIP, Chapter 5, Third Party Information. Updated 22 February 2023. 14 In Canadian Bank Note Limited v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance, (2016), Justice Zarzeczny found that unit prices in a contract between Saskatchewan Government Insurance and a third party (Veridos Canada Ltd.) did not qualify as a trade secret. Subsection 18(1)(b) Third party information 18(1) Subject to Part V and this section, a head shall refuse to give access to a record that contains: … (b) financial, commercial, scientific, technical or labour relations information that is supplied in confidence, implicitly or explicitly, to a local authority by a third party; … (2) A head may give access to a record that contains information described in subsection (1) with the written consent of the third party to whom the information relates. (3) Subject to Part V, a head may give access to a record that contains information described in clauses (1)(b) to (d) if: (a) disclosure of that information could reasonably be expected to be in the public interest as it relates to public health, public safety or protection of the environment; and (b) the public interest in disclosure could reasonably be expected to clearly outweigh in importance any: (i) financial loss or gain to; (ii) prejudice to the competitive position of; or (iii) interference with contractual or other negotiations of; a third party. Subsection 18(1)(b) of LA FOIP is a mandatory, class-based exemption. It permits refusal of access in situations where a record contains financial, commercial, scientific, technical, or labour relations information that was supplied in confidence to a local authority by a third party.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTgwMjYzOA==